New Georgia Family Law Family Law Blog | Remboldt Law Firm, LLC
  • New GA Court Opinions
  • Resources - Books
  • Resources - More
  • About
  • Contact

Criminal contempt order requiring Rhode Island resident to pay $5K fine and be imprisoned for 200 days for her failure to comply with terms of temporary modification of parental grandparents’ visitation rights to her two children REVERSED.

Posted Oct.07, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Contempt, Custody, Grandparents, Jurisdiction, Modification, UCCJEA, Visitation

 Contempt, Jurisdiction, Modification, UCCJEA, Uniform Child Custody Jurisdicton

Criminal contempt order requiring Rhode Island resident to pay $5K fine and be imprisoned for 200 days for her failure to comply with terms of temporary modification of parental grandparents’ visitation rights to her two children REVERSED; trial court had jurisdiction over grandparents’ modification action, since initial custody determination complied with OCGA 19-9-61, children’s father still lived in Georgia, and personal jurisdiction over mother was not necessary in order to address requested modification; trial court lacked personal jurisdiction under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) over mother for contempt and personal service of mother outside Georgia was invalid under circumstances;  Court relied on Ashburn v. Baker, 256 Ga. 507 (1986), which held that Georgia courts did not have personal jurisdiciton over non-risident mother, who was served outside Georgia, under either now-repealed UCCJEA or long arm statutue, and found the UCCJEA required same result; UCCJEA specifically addresses continuing jurisdiction of cusotdy issues, but not contempt issues and it did not repeal any existing statutory provisions covering divorce, custody, alimony or child support procedures; mother did not admit personal jurisdiciton when she failed to respond to discovery served with complaint, since return of service only showed that she was served with summons and complaint, not discovery; contempt order was not enforceable in Rhode Island pursuant to UCCJEA, since applicable provisions referred to custody determinations and did not includ contempt orders.

Daniels v. Barnes,  A07A1719 (03/04/08), 08 FCDR 795

Fulton County Daily Report, 03/21/2008

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

Denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss appellee’s complaint to record and modify Alabama child support order, REVERSED in GA.

Posted Sep.28, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Attorney Fees, Child Support, Jurisdiction, UCCJEA

 Child Support, Jurisdiction, UCCJEA

Denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss appellee’s complaint to record and modify Alabama child support order, REVERSED; trial court erred by finding that appellant was Georgia resident for these purposes and also erred by awarding attorneys’ fees to appellee on modification action; trial court erred in ruling that appellant resides in Georgia, since there was extensive evidence that appellant continues to consider Alabama his home and he intends to remain there.

Kean v. Marshall, A08A0828 (11/10/08), 08 FCDR 3730

Fulton County Daily Report, 12/05/2008.

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Court SHALL Consider All 8 Factors before Declining Jurisdiction

Posted Nov.05, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Custody, Jurisdiction, UCCJEA

 Custody, Jurisdicion, UCCJEA

Grant of mother’s motion for trial court to decline to exercise its jurisdiction under UCCJEA with regard to father’s petition for change of custody of parties 14-year-old son based on child’s selection under OCGA 19-9-3(a)(5), VACATED; Fulton County Superior Court had exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over father’s petition, since it rendered prior child custody determination consistent with UCCJEA and father is Georgia resident with significant connection to state; superior court abused its discretion in declining jurisdiction, because it apparently did not comply with statutory requirement that it shall consider all eight factors set forth in OCGA 19-9-67(b); superior court did not err in considering revised provisions of 19-9-3(a)(5), effective January 1, 2008, since father filed his motion in August 2008; mother’s subsequent filing of contempt motion did not estop her from claiming that Fulton County Superior Court was inconvenient forum from custody proceeding.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report 09/25/2009)

Murillo v. Murillo, A09A1500 (09/10/09), 09 FCDR 2986

Attorneys:  Elizabeth J. Kuhn, Jesus A. Nerio

Judges:  Cynthia D. Wright, Fulton Superior Court;  Appellant Judges:  Andrews, Miller, Barnes

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

Search

Categories

  • Adoption (7)
  • Alimony (16)
  • Appeal (26)
  • Articles (3)
  • Attorney Fees (28)
  • Capacity (3)
  • Child Support (51)
  • Common Law Marriage (1)
  • Contempt (18)
  • Custody (77)
  • Deprivation (29)
  • DFACS (2)
  • Divorce (49)
  • Equitable Division (23)
  • Evidence (20)
  • Grandparents (14)
  • Guardan Ad Litem (1)
  • Insurance Benefits (1)
  • Jurisdiction (26)
  • Legitimation (4)
  • Mediation (1)
  • Military (1)
  • Modification (21)
  • Parental Rights (27)
  • Paternity / Legitimation (8)
  • Prenuptial Agreement (5)
  • Property Settlement (4)
  • Service by Publication (1)
  • Service of Process (1)
  • Settlement Agreement (12)
  • Temporary Protective Order (TPO) (3)
  • Transcripts (10)
  • Trial Counsel (4)
  • UCCJEA (8)
  • UIFSA (2)
  • Uncategorized (7)
  • Visitation (15)

Archives

  • May 2012 (6)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (8)
  • February 2012 (7)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (6)
  • July 2011 (4)
  • June 2011 (6)
  • May 2011 (9)
  • April 2011 (3)
  • March 2011 (8)
  • February 2011 (8)
  • January 2011 (7)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (7)
  • August 2010 (6)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (10)
  • May 2010 (11)
  • April 2010 (9)
  • March 2010 (9)
  • February 2010 (10)
  • January 2010 (11)
  • December 2009 (10)
  • November 2009 (10)
  • October 2009 (3)
  • September 2009 (7)
 
Powered by WordPress.   A CJ Remboldt Blog
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Copyright 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, JD/MBA. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.