<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Georgia Family Law&#187; marital property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newgafamilylaw.com/tag/marital-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com</link>
	<description>New Opinions, Opportunities, Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wife in Contempt of Temporary Order</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/wife-contempt-temporary-order/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/wife-contempt-temporary-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Findings of Fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wife in Contempt of Temporary Order]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/wife-contempt-temporary-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judgement ordering appellant to pay to his ex-wife out-of-pocket sum of $64,044.45, in addition to $33,955.55 sum from his share of net profits from sale of parties&#8217; lake house, PARTIALLY REVERSED</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgement-ordering-appellant-pay-exwife-outofpocket-sum-6404445-addition-3395555-sum-share-net-profits-sale-parties-lake-house-partiall-reversed/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgement-ordering-appellant-pay-exwife-outofpocket-sum-6404445-addition-3395555-sum-share-net-profits-sale-parties-lake-house-partiall-reversed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judgement ordering appellant to pay to his ex-wife out-of-pocket sum of $64,044.45, in addition to $33,955.55 sum from his share of net profits from sale of parties' lake house, PARTIALL REVERSED]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgement-ordering-appellant-pay-exwife-outofpocket-sum-6404445-addition-3395555-sum-share-net-profits-sale-parties-lake-house-partiall-reversed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For equitable division of property titled must be in one of the spouses, even by determination that fraudulent conveyance has occurred.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/equitable-division-property-titled-spouses-determination-fraudulent-conveyance-occurred/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/equitable-division-property-titled-spouses-determination-fraudulent-conveyance-occurred/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For equitable division of property titled must be in one of the spouses, even by determination that fraudulent conveyance has occurred.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/equitable-division-property-titled-spouses-determination-fraudulent-conveyance-occurred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA pension accounts are marital property, but only parties&#8217; contributions as employees.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-pension-accounts-marital-property-parties-contributions-employees/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-pension-accounts-marital-property-parties-contributions-employees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA pension accounts are marital property, but only parties' contributions as employees. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-pension-accounts-marital-property-parties-contributions-employees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In GA, absent transcript, evidence presumably supported award to wife of eight parcels of property, which were owned and titled exclusively in her name.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/ga-absent-transcript-evidence-supported-award-wife-parcels-property-owned-titled-exclusively/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/ga-absent-transcript-evidence-supported-award-wife-parcels-property-owned-titled-exclusively/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appelas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys's Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expenses of Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcipt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In GA, absent transcript, evidence presumably supported award to wife of eight parcels of property, which were owned and titled exclusively in her name.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/ga-absent-transcript-evidence-supported-award-wife-parcels-property-owned-titled-exclusively/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lump Sum Alimony AFFIRMED, value of marital property exceeded that amount.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lump Sum Alimony AFFIRMED, value of marital property exceeded that amount.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA trial court DID NOT abuse its discretion in awarding wife $50K in lump sum alimony, since evidence supported trial court&#8217;s findings regarding husband&#8217;s income level.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-trial-court-abuse-discretion-awarding-wife-50k-lump-sum-alimony-evidence-supported-trial-courts-findings-husbands-income-level/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-trial-court-abuse-discretion-awarding-wife-50k-lump-sum-alimony-evidence-supported-trial-courts-findings-husbands-income-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA trial court DID NOT abuse its discretion in awarding wife $50K in lump sum alimony, since evidence supported trial court's findings regarding husband's income level.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-trial-court-abuse-discretion-awarding-wife-50k-lump-sum-alimony-evidence-supported-trial-courts-findings-husbands-income-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uniformed Services Former Souses&#8217; Protection Act&#8217;s 10-year requirement has no bearing on state court&#8217;s authority to treat as divisible marital property.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/jurisdiction/uniformed-services-souses-protection-acts-10year-requirement-bearing-state-courts-authority-treat-divisible-marital-property/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/jurisdiction/uniformed-services-souses-protection-acts-10year-requirement-bearing-state-courts-authority-treat-divisible-marital-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Retirement Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uniformed Services Former Souses' Protection Act's 10-year requirement has no bearing on state court's authority to treat as divisible marital property.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/jurisdiction/uniformed-services-souses-protection-acts-10year-requirement-bearing-state-courts-authority-treat-divisible-marital-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA courts must determine whether stock options vesting directly resulted from parties&#8217; labors and investments during the marriage.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-courts-determine-stock-options-vesting-resulted-parties-labors-investments-marriage/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-courts-determine-stock-options-vesting-resulted-parties-labors-investments-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 16:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA courts must determine whether stock options vesting directly resulted from parties' labors and investments during the marriage.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-courts-determine-stock-options-vesting-resulted-parties-labors-investments-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In GA, the characterized of a sum as alimony is not controlling.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-characterized-sum-alimony-controlling/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-characterized-sum-alimony-controlling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In GA, the characterized of a sum as alimony is not controlling, alimony terminates at death or receiving spouse's remarriage and if a trial court clearly intended award to equalize distribution of parties martial debt it is not alimony.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-characterized-sum-alimony-controlling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

