<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Georgia Family Law&#187; Alimony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newgafamilylaw.com/tag/alimony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com</link>
	<description>Family Law Blog &#124; Remboldt Law Firm, LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GA Supreme Court affirmed judgment awarding alimony, once husband’s pension matures; trial court did not abuse its discretion in dividing the parties’ marital assets and in awarding attorneys&#8217; fees.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-supreme-court-affirmed-judgment-awarding-alimony-husbands-pension-matures-trial-court-abuse-discretion-dividing-parties-marital-assets-awarding-attorneys-fees/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-supreme-court-affirmed-judgment-awarding-alimony-husbands-pension-matures-trial-court-abuse-discretion-dividing-parties-marital-assets-awarding-attorneys-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 20:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Supreme Court affirmed judgment awarding alimony, once husband’s pension matures; trial court did not abuse its discretion in dividing the parties’ marital assets and in awarding attorneys' fees.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-supreme-court-affirmed-judgment-awarding-alimony-husbands-pension-matures-trial-court-abuse-discretion-dividing-parties-marital-assets-awarding-attorneys-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Supreme Court partially reversed the order retroactively extinguishing alimony obligation.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-supreme-court-partially-reversed-order-retroactively-extinguishing-alimony-obligation/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-supreme-court-partially-reversed-order-retroactively-extinguishing-alimony-obligation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Supreme Court partially reversed the order retroactively extinguishing alimony obligation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-supreme-court-partially-reversed-order-retroactively-extinguishing-alimony-obligation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA trial court did not err by ordering alimony for wife because wife is disabled and husband&#8217;s income is sufficient to pay.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-trial-court-err-ordering-alimony-wife-wife-disabled-husbands-income-sufficient-pay/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-trial-court-err-ordering-alimony-wife-wife-disabled-husbands-income-sufficient-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Settlement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA trial court did not err by ordering alimony for wife because wife is disabled and husband's income is sufficient to pay.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-trial-court-err-ordering-alimony-wife-wife-disabled-husbands-income-sufficient-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA order on petition for contempt in divorce case, PARTIALLY REVERSED, since trial court ERRED  in ruling that husband was not obligated to pay termporary alimony payments that were payable prior to entry of remittitur in this case.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-order-petition-contempt-divorce-case-partially-reversed-trial-court-erred-ruling-husband-obligated-pay-termporary-alimony-payments-payable-prior-entry-remittitur-case/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-order-petition-contempt-divorce-case-partially-reversed-trial-court-erred-ruling-husband-obligated-pay-termporary-alimony-payments-payable-prior-entry-remittitur-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA order on petition for contempt in divorce case, PARTIALLY REVERSED, since trial court ERRED  in ruling that husband was not obligated to pay. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-order-petition-contempt-divorce-case-partially-reversed-trial-court-erred-ruling-husband-obligated-pay-termporary-alimony-payments-payable-prior-entry-remittitur-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA judgment refusing to modify downward husband&#8217;s alimony payments to his former wife, REVERSED.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-judgment-refusing-modify-downward-husbands-alimony-payments-wife-reversed/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-judgment-refusing-modify-downward-husbands-alimony-payments-wife-reversed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA judgment refusing to modify downward husband's alimony payments to his former wife, REVERSED.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-judgment-refusing-modify-downward-husbands-alimony-payments-wife-reversed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lump Sum Alimony AFFIRMED, value of marital property exceeded that amount.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lump Sum Alimony AFFIRMED, value of marital property exceeded that amount.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA trial court DID NOT abuse its discretion in awarding wife $50K in lump sum alimony, since evidence supported trial court&#8217;s findings regarding husband&#8217;s income level.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-trial-court-abuse-discretion-awarding-wife-50k-lump-sum-alimony-evidence-supported-trial-courts-findings-husbands-income-level/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-trial-court-abuse-discretion-awarding-wife-50k-lump-sum-alimony-evidence-supported-trial-courts-findings-husbands-income-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA trial court DID NOT abuse its discretion in awarding wife $50K in lump sum alimony, since evidence supported trial court's findings regarding husband's income level.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/evidence/ga-trial-court-abuse-discretion-awarding-wife-50k-lump-sum-alimony-evidence-supported-trial-courts-findings-husbands-income-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Appellant sought to modify lump sum alimony which is non-revisable division of property even though jury&#8217;s called payment periodic alimony.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-appellant-sought-modify-lump-sum-alimony-nonrevisable-division-property-jurys-called-payment-periodic-alimony/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-appellant-sought-modify-lump-sum-alimony-nonrevisable-division-property-jurys-called-payment-periodic-alimony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Appellant sought to modify lump sum alimony which is non-revisable division of property even though jury's called payment periodic alimony.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-appellant-sought-modify-lump-sum-alimony-nonrevisable-division-property-jurys-called-payment-periodic-alimony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Court order that executed upon affidavit of non-compliance by wife&#8217;s counsel, is prohibited!</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-court-order-executed-affidavit-noncompliance-wifes-counsel-prohibited/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-court-order-executed-affidavit-noncompliance-wifes-counsel-prohibited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 16:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Court order that executed upon affidavit of non-compliance by wife's counsel, is prohibited!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-court-order-executed-affidavit-noncompliance-wifes-counsel-prohibited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In GA, the characterized of a sum as alimony is not controlling.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-characterized-sum-alimony-controlling/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-characterized-sum-alimony-controlling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In GA, the characterized of a sum as alimony is not controlling, alimony terminates at death or receiving spouse's remarriage and if a trial court clearly intended award to equalize distribution of parties martial debt it is not alimony.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/ga-characterized-sum-alimony-controlling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

