New Georgia Family Law New Opinions, Opportunities, Resources
  • New GA Court Opinions
  • GA CLE Opportunities
  • Resources - Books
  • Resources - More
  • Resources - Government
  • About

GA Appellant sought to modify lump sum alimony which is non-revisable division of property even though jury’s called payment periodic alimony.

Posted Jun.21, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Alimony

 Alimony

Dismissal of motion for modification of alimony, AFFIRMED; as matter of law, obligation, which appellant sought to modify, consisted of lump sum alimony – 60 monthly payments of $500/month for total of $30K – which constituted non-revisable division of property and jury’s reference to periodic alimony was mere label, not statement of intent.

Rivera v. Rivera, S08A0775 (05/19/08), 08 FCDR 1694

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (05/30/08)

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA father found entitled to reimbursement of more than 11.5K in overpaid child support.

Posted Jun.18, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Child Support

 Child Support

Order finding that appellant was not entitled to reimbursement of more than 11.5K in overpaid child support to appellee, REVERSED, as prior consent order clearly and unambiguously provided that appellant was entitled to be reimbursed if appellee received payments from both appellant and Social Security Administration, which resulted in overpayment of child support as provided in order.

Whitehead v. Peavy, A08A0344 (05/02/08), 08 FCDR 1591

From:  Fulton County Daily Report 05/16/2008)

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment

A GA father’s constant payment of financial support, coupled with his avowed interest in establishing a relationship with child, mitigated against finding of abandonment.

Posted Jun.15, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Paternity / Legitimation

 Legitimation

Denial of father’s petition to legitimate his child, REVERSED; though he did not contact child after August 2004, father’s constant payment of financial support, coupled with his avowed interest in establishing and maintaining relationship with child, mitigated against finding of abandonment; case remanded for trial court to determine whether legitimation is in child’s best interest.

Binns v. Fairnot, A08A0207 (06/27/08), 08 FCDR 2317

From:  Fulton County Daily Report, 07/18/2008.

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA trial court has express authority to modify visitation rights in contempt proceedings and costs directly associated with visitation privileges.

Posted Jun.12, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Contempt, Visitation

 Contempt, Visitation

Order holding wife in contempt of parties’ divorce decree and declaring that wife would now pay 100 percent of costs associated with her supervised child visitation, AFFIRMED; trial court has express authority to modify visitation rights in contempt proceedings and cost in this case were directly associated with wife’s visitation privileges.

Carlson v. Carlson, S08A0704 (07/07/08), 08 FCDR 2286

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (07/18/2008)

  • Share/Save
1 Comment

GA trial court erred in ruling Appellant was estopped from denying obligation to support appellee’s minor child, who was not appellant’s biological or adopted child.

Posted Jun.09, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Adoption, Child Support, Paternity / Legitimation

 Child Support, Promissory Estoppel

Judgment in parties’ divorce case, REVERSED, as trial court erred in ruling that appellant was estopped from denying obligation to support appellee’s minor child, who was not appellant’s biological or adopted child; although appellant signed application to amend child’s birth certificate to list him as her father and give her his name and he allegedly promised to take care of her and be her father, there was no evidence that his promise caused appellee to forego valuable legal right to her detriment; appellant identified child’s biological father, acknowledged that child was aware of his identity and stated that she never sought support, because he did not want anything to do with child.

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA trial court is not required to factor children’s private school tuition into its child support calculations.

Posted Jun.06, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Attorney Fees, Child Support

 attorney's fees, Child Support

Judgment AFFIRMED in parties’ divorce case; trial court was not required to factor children’s private school tuition into its child support calculations and was not required to explain its decision in that regard, since it did not deviate from child support obligation table; trial court DID NOT ERR in failing to include dates for payment of modified child support payments in its temporary modification order, since original dates for payments, 15th and 30th day of each month, remained in effect, through final judgment, which changed payment dates to 1st and 15th day of each month; trial court acted within its broad discretion in setting amount and terms of payment of any attorney’s fee awards; trial court acted within its discretion in requiring wife to pay children’s heath insurance premiums through her employer-sponsored heath care plan.

Johnson v. Johnson, S08F1251 (09/22/08), 08 FCDR 2935.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (10/03/08)

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA wife’s handling of allegations had negative effect on child’s relationship with her father and loses custody.

Posted Jun.03, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Custody

 Custody

Award of primary physical custody of couple’s minor child to husband, AFFIRMED, as evidence supported finding that award was in child’s best interest;  wife’s allegations of sexual abuse were inconclusive, wife’s handling of allegations had negative effect on child’s relationship with her father, husband, who worked nights, had assistance with childcare and husband was able to provide for his child’s need.

King v. King, S08F0810 (09/22/08), 08 FCDR 2933.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report 10/03/2008)

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Court order that executed upon affidavit of non-compliance by wife’s counsel, is prohibited!

Posted May.31, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Alimony, Child Support

 Alimony, Child Support, Due Process

Judgment for wife, which found husband in willful contempt for failure to pay alimony, child support and property division in parties’ final judgment and decree of divorce, PARTIALLY REVERSED, as self-executing incarceration order for failing to pay $18,383.81 arrearage was unenforceable and should be stricken from  judgment; order in question, which executed upon affidavit of non-compliance by wife’s counsel, was prohibited, since it depended entirely upon averments of interested party.

Hall v. Doyle-Hall, S08A0980 (09/22/08), 08 FCDR 2933

From:  Fulton County Daily Report, 10/03/2008.

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment

Court Affirms Weaver v. Jones.

Posted May.28, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Child Support, Jurisdiction

 Child Support, Declaratory Judgment

Judgment for mother AFFIRMED 4-3;  Weaver v. Jones, 260 Ga. 493 (1990) decided question of whether father’s petition seeking declaratory judgment as to his obligation for past child support stated claim for relief; father needed direction from judicial tribunal to remove uncertainty regarding consequences of his planned future actions in continuing to deny mother’s claim of back-due child support based on his understanding of formula set forth in parties divorce decree.

Acevedo v. Kim F/K/A Acevedo, S08A0798 (11/03/08)

From the Fulton County Daily Report (11/14/2008).

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA trial court ERRED in refusing to consider additional evidence from witness discovered after hearing, but before final ruling.

Posted May.25, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Custody, Evidence, Modification

 Child Custody, Evidence, Modification

Denial of mother’s petition to modify custody based on allegations that father touched children inappropriately while they visited him, REVERSED, and case remanded;  trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying mother’s petition, because evidence showing sexual abuse was not conclusive; trial court erred in refusing to consider additional evidence from witness discovered after hearing, but before final ruling, because trial court in custody action must consider all facts and conditions, which present themselves up to time of rendering final judgment.

Hardin v. Hardin, A10A0572 (04/06/10), 10 FCDR 1347

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (04/23/2010)

  • Share/Save
Leave a Comment
« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Search

Categories

  • Adoption (4)
  • Alimony (10)
  • Appeal (20)
  • Attorney Fees (13)
  • Capacity (3)
  • Child Support (23)
  • Common Law Marriage (1)
  • Contempt (7)
  • Custody (37)
  • Deprivation (19)
  • Divorce (27)
  • Equitable Division (16)
  • Evidence (18)
  • Grandparents (6)
  • Insurance Benefits (1)
  • Jurisdiction (18)
  • Modification (6)
  • Parental Rights (19)
  • Paternity / Legitimation (5)
  • Prenuptial Agreement (3)
  • Settlement Agreement (2)
  • Temporary Protective Order (TPO) (3)
  • Transcripts (7)
  • Trial Counsel (3)
  • UCCJEA (3)
  • UIFSA (1)
  • Uncategorized (1)
  • Visitation (5)

Archives

  • September 2010 (1)
  • August 2010 (6)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (10)
  • May 2010 (11)
  • April 2010 (9)
  • March 2010 (9)
  • February 2010 (10)
  • January 2010 (11)
  • December 2009 (10)
  • November 2009 (10)
  • October 2009 (3)
  • September 2009 (7)
 
Powered by WordPress.   A CJ Remboldt Blog
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Copyright 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.