<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Georgia Family Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newgafamilylaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com</link>
	<description>New Opinions, Opportunities, Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GA mother was not properly served with process.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/grandparents/ga-mother-properly-served-process/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/grandparents/ga-mother-properly-served-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grandparents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service of Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA mother was not properly served with process.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/grandparents/ga-mother-properly-served-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA trial court erred in finding that wife&#8217;s trade account was marital property subject to equitable division.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-trial-court-erred-finding-wifes-trade-account-marital-property-subject-equitable-division/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-trial-court-erred-finding-wifes-trade-account-marital-property-subject-equitable-division/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separate property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA trial court erred in finding that wife's trade account was marital property subject to equitable division.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-trial-court-erred-finding-wifes-trade-account-marital-property-subject-equitable-division/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Order refusing to allow husband to seek downward modification of child support, reversed.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-order-refusing-husband-seek-downward-modification-child-support-reversed/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-order-refusing-husband-seek-downward-modification-child-support-reversed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Order refusing to allow husband to seek downward modification of child support, reversed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-order-refusing-husband-seek-downward-modification-child-support-reversed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA The need to reach final resolution expeditiously, as children need permanence of home and emotional stability and should not be required to linger indefinitely in foster care.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/parental-rights/ga-reach-final-resolution-expeditiously-children-permanence-home-emotional-stability-required-linger-indefinitely-foster-care/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/parental-rights/ga-reach-final-resolution-expeditiously-children-permanence-home-emotional-stability-required-linger-indefinitely-foster-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA The need to reach final resolution expeditiously, as children need permanence of home and emotional stability and should not be required to linger indefinitely in foster care.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/parental-rights/ga-reach-final-resolution-expeditiously-children-permanence-home-emotional-stability-required-linger-indefinitely-foster-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Any discrepancy between trial court&#8217;s oral pronouncements and written judgement must be resolved in favor of written judgment.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/uncategorized/ga-discrepancy-trial-courts-oral-pronouncements-written-judgement-resolved-favor-written-judgment/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/uncategorized/ga-discrepancy-trial-courts-oral-pronouncements-written-judgement-resolved-favor-written-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Violence Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Any discrepancy between trial court's oral pronouncements and written judgement must be resolved in favor of written judgment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/uncategorized/ga-discrepancy-trial-courts-oral-pronouncements-written-judgement-resolved-favor-written-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA grant of $2.5K in attorneys&#8217; fees to mother, vacated, as trial court&#8217;s order failed to specify any basis for award.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-grant-25k-attorneys-fees-mother-vacated-trial-courts-order-failed-basis-award/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-grant-25k-attorneys-fees-mother-vacated-trial-courts-order-failed-basis-award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA grant of $2.5K in attorneys' fees to mother, vacated, as trial court's order failed to specify any basis for award.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-grant-25k-attorneys-fees-mother-vacated-trial-courts-order-failed-basis-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Settlement agreement was not incorporated in her divorce decree.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/795/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/795/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Settlement agreement was not incorporated in her divorce decree.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/795/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Finding that minor child was deprived, reversed, as no evidence showed that mother was unfit to care for child.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/deprivation/ga-finding-minor-child-deprived-reversed-evidence-showed-mother-unfit-care-child/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/deprivation/ga-finding-minor-child-deprived-reversed-evidence-showed-mother-unfit-care-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deprivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deprived]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Finding that minor child was deprived, reversed, as no evidence showed that mother was unfit to care for child.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/deprivation/ga-finding-minor-child-deprived-reversed-evidence-showed-mother-unfit-care-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA trial court does not have authority to modify final order of custody during contempt proceeding.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/service-by-publication/ga-trial-court-authority-modify-final-order-custody-contempt-proceeding/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/service-by-publication/ga-trial-court-authority-modify-final-order-custody-contempt-proceeding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Service by Publication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA trial court does not have authority to modify final order of custody during contempt proceeding.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/service-by-publication/ga-trial-court-authority-modify-final-order-custody-contempt-proceeding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Nunc pro tunc order, affirmed, in divorce case.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-nunc-pro-tunc-order-affirmed-divorce-case/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-nunc-pro-tunc-order-affirmed-divorce-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Nunc pro tunc order, affirmed, in divorce case.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-nunc-pro-tunc-order-affirmed-divorce-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.611 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-05 18:51:15 -->

