New Georgia Family Law New Opinions, Opportunities, Resources
  • New GA Court Opinions
  • GA CLE
  • Resources - Books
  • Resources - More
  • Resources - Government
  • About
  • Contact

GA Any discrepancy between trial court’s oral pronouncements and written judgement must be resolved in favor of written judgment.

Posted Jan.18, 2012 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Uncategorized

 Family Violence Act

Grant of wife’s petition for temporary family violence protective order against husband pursuant to Family Violence Act, affirmed, as any discrepancy between trial court’s oral pronouncements and written judgement must be resolved in favor of written judgment, and O.C.G.A. § 19-13-4 does not require that family violence protective order include written findings of fact and conclusions of law; record belied husband’s contention that trial court authorized wife’s attorney to decide amount of child support award, as standardized form order contained handwritten language and deletions made by trial court; trial court did not err in concluding that it had no authority to direct clerk of court to withhold transmission of family violence protective order to Georgia Protective Order Registry because language of O.C.G.A. § 19-13-53 (b) required such transmission, without exception, and trial court did not have discretion to convert family violence petition into civil restraining order in parties’ divorce action.

Birchby v. Carboy, A11A1355 (08/29/11)

Fulton County Daily Report, September 9, 2011

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA juvenile court erred by failing to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law in terminating temporary guardianship.

Posted Dec.13, 2011 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Uncategorized

 Guardianship

Juvenile court’s order regarding terminating temporary guardianship of minor children by their grandmother, reversed; trial courts are required to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law in all non-jury trials; because guardianship is similar to custody and written findings are required in contested child custody cases, juvenile court erred by failing to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law.

In the Interest of A.R., A11A0147 (06/09/11)

Fulton County Daily Report, June 24, 2011

 

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

State Courts Generally Are Not Authorized to Impose Income Tax Liability

Posted May.28, 2011 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Divorce, Equitable Division, Uncategorized

 Divorce, Income Tax Liability

Final judgment and decree of divorce mandating that husband and wife be equally responsible for any tax liability from wife’s photography business and specifying exact dollar amounts for mimimum gross receipts and profiest to be reflected on wife’s business’s amended tax returns, PARTIALLY REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED; state courts generally are not authorized to impose income tax liability, and any determination in this case that parties were jointly and severally liable was premature because of husband’s contested claim that he qualifies as innocent spouse, trial court erred because it alked accurate and complted documentation and other evidence necessary to calculated such amounts.

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

Trial court’s attempt to change order on legitimation petition not authorized under Georgia Law.

Posted May.16, 2011 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Paternity / Legitimation, Trial Counsel, Uncategorized

 Clerical Error, Legitimation, Term of Court

Trial court’s attempt to change order on legitimation petition from dismissal with prejudice to dismissal without prejudice, REVERSED; changing order in subsequent term of court from dismissal with prejudice to dismissal without prejudice was not clerical error but substantive change not authorized under Georgia law.

Ivery v. Brown, A10A2298 (02/07/2011)

From:  Fulton County Daily Report, February 25, 2011.

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

Trial court properly concluded that father had not cruelly treated child such that material change in conditition warranted change of custody.

Posted Feb.21, 2011 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Uncategorized

 Child Custody, Cruelty to Children, Modification, Nolo Contendere

Denial of mother’s petition seeking modification of custody of parties’ child, AFFIRMED; father’s nolo plea to third degree child crueltry in 2008 neither established as matter of law, nor provided any evidence, that father committed act of criminal creulty toward child and, under O.C.G.A § 17-7-95 (c), trial court lacked authority to even consider fact that father entered plea; after considering evidence and detailed report of guardian ad litem, trial court properly concluded that father had not cruelly treated child such that material change in conditition warranted change of custody.

Vaughn v. Stafford, A10A2166 (10/20/10), 10 FCDR 3409

From:  Fulton County Daily Report, 11/05/2010.

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

DFACS improperly placed him on child abuse registry, after entering into safety plan with his wife, following allegations of child abuse.

Posted Jan.17, 2011 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Appeal, Custody, Uncategorized

 Child Custody; Due Process, Declaratory Judgment, Mandamus

Grant of summary judgment to appellee AFFIRMED in appellant’s action for declaratory judgment and mandamus, alleging that DFACS improperly placed him on child abuse registry, after entering into safety plan with his wife, following allegations of child abuse; trial court did not err in ruling that appellant could not attempt to use mandamus and declaratory judgment to essentially relitigate and overturn custody decisions, which divorce court entered; proper means to address custody would be to file appropriate appeal or motions for modification of custody in divorce court; in any event appellant’s claims were based on provisions of O.C G. A. § 49-5-180 et. seq., which Court in State v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308 (1998), struck down in its entirety, including child abuse registry.  Jenkins v. Walker, S10A0907 (09/20/10), 10 FCDR 3009.

Jenkins v. Walker, S10A0907 (09/20/10), FCDR 3009

From:  Fulton County Daily Report, 10/1/2010

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Attorney Disbarred for Altering Divorce Clients Discovery

Posted Jan.13, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Uncategorized

 Attorney Fees, Divorce

Attorney disbarred for violating Rules of Professional Conduct; attorney failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing personal injury client, made false statement to Officer of General Counsel (OGC) after client filed grievance and did not take steps to protect client’s interests after terminating representation; in another case, attorney altered his divorce client’s discovery responses without consulting client, signed client’s name to misleading and inaccurate financial affidavit without authorization, did not refund client’s unearned fees and made false statements to OGC.

In re Eaton, S09Y0704 (10/19/09)

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

Search

Categories

  • Adoption (7)
  • Alimony (14)
  • Appeal (26)
  • Articles (3)
  • Attorney Fees (25)
  • Capacity (3)
  • Child Support (47)
  • Common Law Marriage (1)
  • Contempt (17)
  • Custody (63)
  • Deprivation (23)
  • DFACS (1)
  • Divorce (46)
  • Equitable Division (23)
  • Evidence (20)
  • Grandparents (11)
  • Guardan Ad Litem (1)
  • Insurance Benefits (1)
  • Jurisdiction (24)
  • Legitimation (1)
  • Mediation (1)
  • Military (1)
  • Modification (19)
  • Parental Rights (25)
  • Paternity / Legitimation (8)
  • Prenuptial Agreement (4)
  • Property Settlement (2)
  • Service by Publication (1)
  • Service of Process (1)
  • Settlement Agreement (11)
  • Temporary Protective Order (TPO) (3)
  • Transcripts (10)
  • Trial Counsel (4)
  • UCCJEA (8)
  • UIFSA (2)
  • Uncategorized (7)
  • Visitation (12)

Archives

  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (6)
  • July 2011 (4)
  • June 2011 (6)
  • May 2011 (9)
  • April 2011 (3)
  • March 2011 (8)
  • February 2011 (8)
  • January 2011 (7)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (7)
  • August 2010 (6)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (10)
  • May 2010 (11)
  • April 2010 (9)
  • March 2010 (9)
  • February 2010 (10)
  • January 2010 (11)
  • December 2009 (10)
  • November 2009 (10)
  • October 2009 (3)
  • September 2009 (7)
 
Powered by WordPress.   A CJ Remboldt Blog
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Copyright 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, JD/MBA. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.