New Georgia Family Law Family Law Blog | Remboldt Law Firm, LLC
  • New GA Court Opinions
  • Resources - Books
  • Resources - More
  • About
  • Contact

GA Spoliation and Litigation Potential

Posted Jan.04, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Evidence

 Evidence, litigation, spoliation

Judgment affirmed in Silman v. Assocs. Bellemead, 294 Ga.App. 764 (2008); phrase, potential for litigation, in Baxley v. Hakiel Insudtried, 282 Ga. 312 (2007), refers to litigation that is actually contemplated or pending and nothing more;  Baxley reaffirmed proposition that ‘ “spoliation refers to the destruction or failure to preserve evidence that is necessary to contemplated or pending litigation.” ‘

Silman v. Associates Belemead, S09G0490 (10/19/09).

Fulton County Daily Report, 10/30/2009.

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA – Admitting Child Forensic Interview Affirmed

Posted Jan.01, 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Capacity, Evidence, Trial Counsel

 Child Abuse, Child Hearsay, Child Sexual Molestation, Evidence, Trial Counsel

Trial court does not abuse its discretion in admitting videotape of child’s (victim’s) forensic interview, when interviewer develops rapport with child, does not attempt to influence child, asks open-ended questions and followed most widely-used forensic technique in country.

Brown v. State, A09A0894 (10/07/09)

Attorneys:  Anne L. Watson, Travis Anton Williams, Lee Darragh, Wanda Lynn Vance

Judges:  David Burroughs, Hall Superior Court; Phipps, Bernes, Adams, Georgia Court of Appeals

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Juvenile Court Lacked Personal Jurisdiction Over Mother Based On Its Improper Grant Of Service By Publication

Posted Dec.26, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Custody, Evidence, Jurisdiction

 Custody, Juvenile court, Personal Jurisdiciton, Service, Service by Publication

Order of ajudication and grant of custody to paternal grandparents REVERSED AND VACATED  as juvenile court erred in granting service by publication on childen’s mother; paternal grandparents had available communication channels through which they could have notified mother of hearing, but failed to do so, and juvenile court also failed to place any burden on paternal grandparents to determine what notice they had given her; juvenile court lacked personal jurisdiction over mother based on its improper grant of service by publication and erred in failing to set aside its ajuduication order when mother’s physical location was known and no one attempted to personally serve her.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (10/23/2009)

Taylor v. Padgett, A09A1384 (10/06/09), 09 FCDR 3247

Attorneys:  Shawn D. Bible, John S. Husser

Judges:  J Michael Giglio, Catoosa Juvenile Court; Miller, Andrews, Barnes, Georgia Court of Appeals

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Contempt Incarceration Can Not Depend Upon Averments of Interested Party

Posted Dec.08, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Appeal, Divorce, Evidence

 Contempt, divorce contempt, incarceration, Res Judicata

Order incarcerating appellant for contempt arising from her divorce decree, REVERSED, as trial court erred in incarcerating appellant based only upon letter from opposing counsel asserting that she had not complied with terms of trial court’s October 15, 2008 order – incarceration of contumacious party cannot depend upon mere averments of interested party; res judicata did not bar appellant’s appeal, because she appealed order entered subsequent to her prior appeal.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (10/16/09)

Bauman v. Humphries, A09A1096 (09/29/09), 09 FCDR 3185

Attorneys:  David Cole, Allen W. Bodiford

Judges:  Brian Amero, Henry Superior Court;  Blackburn, Boyle, Adams, Georgia Court of Appeals

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Child Support Deviations MUST be included in Schedule E

Posted Nov.29, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Child Support, Evidence

 Child Support, Child Support Diviation, Child Support Worksheet, Schedule E

Judgment REVERSED in parties’ divorce case; trial court erred in applying discretionary parenting time deviation from presumptive amount of child support without making all required findings under OCGA 19-6-15(c)(2)(E) and (i)(1)(B); under revised child support guidelines, trial court erred in making separate child support award for extracurricular activities, which was outside parameters of Child Support Worksheet; any deviation for special expenses must be included in Schedule E.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (10/16/09)

Turner v. Turner, S09F1313 (10/05/09)

Attorney:  Pandora E. Palmer, Katherine E. Fagan, Edea M. Caldwell

Judges:  Brian Amero,  Henery Superior Court;  Supreme Court of Georgia, Thompson,

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA – Limitation Forbidding Judge from Expressing Opinion Does Not Apply to Parental Termination Hearing

Posted Nov.26, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Deprivation, Evidence, Parental Rights

 Child Deprivaton Hearing, Comments by Judges, Deprivation, DFACS, Parential Rights

Denial of petition to terminate mother’s parental rights to three children, AFFIRMED, as DFACS failed to present clear and convincing evidence that deprivation was likely to continue; evidence showed that mother had made progress on her case plan, including maintaining housing and employment, undergoing mental health evaluations, completing parenting classes and visiting children; limitation forbidding judge from expressing or intimating his opinion did not apply to termination hearing, since it was not conducted in front of jury.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (10/9/2009)

In the Interest of D.W., A09A0900 (09/23/09)

Attorneys:  Anissa R. Patton, Waymon Sims, Thurbert E. Baker, Shalen S. Nelson, Robert E. Hall, Victoria Warren

Judges:  George Blau, Fulton Juvenile Court; Georgia Court of Appeals, Smith, Bernes, Phipps

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

Trial Court Appoint Child’s Evaluation NOT Guardian Ad Litem

Posted Nov.23, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Custody, Evidence

 disinterest party, guardian ad litem, psychological evaluation

Judgment affirmed in parties’ divorce case; given conflicting evidence, trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting primary physical custody of parties’ children to wife; husband’s objection to trial court’s appointment of woman, who met wife and children, in her role as executive director of children advocacy center, rejected, since trial court appointed woman to evaluate children’s psychological condition and parental relationships, not to serve as children’s guardian ad litem.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (10/16/09).

Kidd v. Kidd, S09F1350 (10/05/09), 09 FCDR 3145

Attorneys: George M. Saliba II, Phillip N. Golub.

Judges: H. Arthur McLane, Lowndes Superior Court; Supreme Court of GA, Benham

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Plaintiff Did Not Receive Declaratory Judgment Notice of Hearning and Decision Thus No Litigation of Issues and No Res Judicata

Posted Nov.20, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Appeal, Attorney Fees, Evidence

 Declaratory Judgment, Expenses of Litigation, hearning, Notice, Res Judicata

Dismissal with prejudice of plaintiff’s complaint and award of attorneys’ fees to defendant, VACATED, as res judicata did not bar plaintiff’s action; Court previously reversed grant of declratory judgment to defendant in McLeod v. Clements, A09A0632 (06/25/09), 09 FCDR 2226 (07/10/09), because plaintiff was not provided with statutory notice per OCGA 9-4-5, so declaratory judgment hearing and decision was nullity and there was no legitimate litigation of issues in first action; award of attorneys’ fees to defendant based on plaintiff’s’ “wanton disregard of the judicial process”‘ infiling second action was improper.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (10/09/09)

McLeod v. Clements, A09A1256 (09/21/09), 09 FCDR 3091

Attorneys:  R. Jerry McLeod (pre se), Stephen R. Sullivan

Judges: Richard M. Coward, Brooks Superior Court;  Georgia Court of Appeals:  Barnes, Miller, Andrews

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Stalking Order Affirmed Due to the Frequency and Nature of the Contact

Posted Nov.17, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Evidence, Temporary Protective Order (TPO)

 Evidence, exparte protective order, protective order, Stalking, TPO

Grant of stalking protective order enjoining defendant from harassing, contacting, or coming near plaintiff and her family AFFIRMED, as evidence supported it; defendant contacted plaintiff via abusive emails numerous times and placed her under surveillance on several occasions without her consent and defendant ventured onto property where plaintiff worked after plaintiff told him he was no longer welcome there; frequency and nature of defendant’s contact and surveillance was sufficient to conclude that it was done for purpose of harassing and intimidating plaintiff and put her in reasonable fear for her safety; trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding testimony regarding events that occurred more than 20 years before events at issue in this case; defendant did not show any harm in trial court’s failure to tender depositions of two of plaintiff’s coworkers into evidence; plaintiff’s need for protective order was not rendered moot due to defendant’s 14 month compliance with stalking ex-parte protective order.

From:  Fulton County Daily Report (10/9/2009)

Thornton v. Hemphill, A09A1928 (09/22/09), 09 FCDR 3089

Attorneys: William H. Turner Jr., Douglas R. Ballard Jr., Jackson, Winifred Hemphill (Pro Se)

Judges: Arch McGarity, Henry Superior Court, Appellant Judges:  Blackburn, Adams, Doyle

Share/Save
Leave a Comment

GA Denial of Transcript and Hearsay Testimony Ruled Harmless

Posted Sep.25, 2009 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq., under Appeal, Custody, Deprivation, Evidence, Parental Rights, Transcripts

 GA, hearsay, Jurvenile Court Transcript, Juvenile court

A GA juvenile court’s denial of mother’s request for a termination hearing transcript to be used in her appeal is deemed harmless because a transcript is not required to file the appeal and because the transcript and entire record is available for appellate review.

If a juvenile court considers hearsay testimony, and the testimony is not objected to by parent’s Counsel, counsel’s failure to object will not constitute reversible error if other evidence supports the juvenile court’s findings and conclusion.

In the Interest of D.R., A09A0622 (07/07/09)

Judges:  Vincent Crawford, Dekalb Juvenile Court.  Barnes, Miller, Andrews.

For more information contact:  CJ Remboldt

Share/Save
Leave a Comment
Newer Entries »

Search

Categories

  • Adoption (7)
  • Alimony (16)
  • Appeal (26)
  • Articles (3)
  • Attorney Fees (28)
  • Capacity (3)
  • Child Support (51)
  • Common Law Marriage (1)
  • Contempt (18)
  • Custody (77)
  • Deprivation (28)
  • DFACS (2)
  • Divorce (49)
  • Equitable Division (23)
  • Evidence (20)
  • Grandparents (14)
  • Guardan Ad Litem (1)
  • Insurance Benefits (1)
  • Jurisdiction (26)
  • Legitimation (4)
  • Mediation (1)
  • Military (1)
  • Modification (21)
  • Parental Rights (27)
  • Paternity / Legitimation (8)
  • Prenuptial Agreement (5)
  • Property Settlement (4)
  • Service by Publication (1)
  • Service of Process (1)
  • Settlement Agreement (12)
  • Temporary Protective Order (TPO) (3)
  • Transcripts (10)
  • Trial Counsel (4)
  • UCCJEA (8)
  • UIFSA (2)
  • Uncategorized (7)
  • Visitation (15)

Archives

  • May 2012 (5)
  • April 2012 (7)
  • March 2012 (8)
  • February 2012 (7)
  • January 2012 (8)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (6)
  • July 2011 (4)
  • June 2011 (6)
  • May 2011 (9)
  • April 2011 (3)
  • March 2011 (8)
  • February 2011 (8)
  • January 2011 (7)
  • October 2010 (10)
  • September 2010 (7)
  • August 2010 (6)
  • July 2010 (10)
  • June 2010 (10)
  • May 2010 (11)
  • April 2010 (9)
  • March 2010 (9)
  • February 2010 (10)
  • January 2010 (11)
  • December 2009 (10)
  • November 2009 (10)
  • October 2009 (3)
  • September 2009 (7)
 
Powered by WordPress.   A CJ Remboldt Blog
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Copyright 2010 by Cynthia J. Remboldt, JD/MBA. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement.