<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Georgia Family Law&#187; Equitable Division</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newgafamilylaw.com/category/equitable-division/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com</link>
	<description>New Opinions, Opportunities, Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>State Courts Generally Are Not Authorized to Impose Income Tax Liability</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/uncategorized/state-courts-enerally-authorized-impose-income-tax-liability/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/uncategorized/state-courts-enerally-authorized-impose-income-tax-liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State Courts Generally Are Not Authorized to Impose Income Tax Liability]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/uncategorized/state-courts-enerally-authorized-impose-income-tax-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA Child Support, Divorce, Settlement Agreement, Civil Contempt, Attorneys&#8217; Fees, Expenses of Litigation</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-child-support-divorce-settlement-agreement-civil-contempt-attorneys-fees-expenses-litigation/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-child-support-divorce-settlement-agreement-civil-contempt-attorneys-fees-expenses-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UIFSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expenses of Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Child Support, Divorce, Settlement Agreement, Civil Contempt, Attorneys' Fees, Expenses of Litigation]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-child-support-divorce-settlement-agreement-civil-contempt-attorneys-fees-expenses-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judgement ordering appellant to pay to his ex-wife out-of-pocket sum of $64,044.45, in addition to $33,955.55 sum from his share of net profits from sale of parties&#8217; lake house, PARTIALLY REVERSED</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgement-ordering-appellant-pay-exwife-outofpocket-sum-6404445-addition-3395555-sum-share-net-profits-sale-parties-lake-house-partiall-reversed/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgement-ordering-appellant-pay-exwife-outofpocket-sum-6404445-addition-3395555-sum-share-net-profits-sale-parties-lake-house-partiall-reversed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judgement ordering appellant to pay to his ex-wife out-of-pocket sum of $64,044.45, in addition to $33,955.55 sum from his share of net profits from sale of parties' lake house, PARTIALL REVERSED]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgement-ordering-appellant-pay-exwife-outofpocket-sum-6404445-addition-3395555-sum-share-net-profits-sale-parties-lake-house-partiall-reversed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA trial court did not err in excluding evidence of temporary order.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-trial-court-err-excluding-evidence-temporary-order/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-trial-court-err-excluding-evidence-temporary-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Contempt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA trial court did not err in excluding evidence of temporary order.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-trial-court-err-excluding-evidence-temporary-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For equitable division of property titled must be in one of the spouses, even by determination that fraudulent conveyance has occurred.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/equitable-division-property-titled-spouses-determination-fraudulent-conveyance-occurred/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/equitable-division-property-titled-spouses-determination-fraudulent-conveyance-occurred/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For equitable division of property titled must be in one of the spouses, even by determination that fraudulent conveyance has occurred.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/appeal/equitable-division-property-titled-spouses-determination-fraudulent-conveyance-occurred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In GA, one who has accepted benefits under a divorce decree is stopped from seeking to set aside that decree without first returning the benefits.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-accepted-benefits-divorce-decree-stopped-seeking-set-decree-returning-benefits/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-accepted-benefits-divorce-decree-stopped-seeking-set-decree-returning-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equitable division of property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estoppel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In GA, one who has accepted benefits under a divorce decree is stopped from seeking to set aside that decree without first returning the benefits.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-accepted-benefits-divorce-decree-stopped-seeking-set-decree-returning-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA pension accounts are marital property, but only parties&#8217; contributions as employees.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-pension-accounts-marital-property-parties-contributions-employees/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-pension-accounts-marital-property-parties-contributions-employees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA pension accounts are marital property, but only parties' contributions as employees. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-pension-accounts-marital-property-parties-contributions-employees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA judgment in contempt case AFFIRMED; 21.9 acres, which surrounded parties&#8217; 5-acre residential parcel, was not encompassed in their final judgment and divorce decree, and thus remained joint property.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-judgment-contempt-case-affirmed-219-acres-surrounded-parties-5acre-residential-parcel-encompassed-final-judgment-divorce-decree-remained-joint-property/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-judgment-contempt-case-affirmed-219-acres-surrounded-parties-5acre-residential-parcel-encompassed-final-judgment-divorce-decree-remained-joint-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title to Land]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA judgment in contempt case AFFIRMED; 21.9 acres, which surrounded parties' 5-acre residential parcel, was not encompassed in their final judgment and divorce decree, and thus remained joint property.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/ga-judgment-contempt-case-affirmed-219-acres-surrounded-parties-5acre-residential-parcel-encompassed-final-judgment-divorce-decree-remained-joint-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judgment, AFFIRMED, in parties&#8217; divorce action; record belied husband&#8217;s contention that terms of parties&#8217; oral settlement agreement were still in dispute.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgment-affirmed-parties-divorce-action-record-belied-husbands-contention-terms-parties-oral-settlement-agreement-dispute/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgment-affirmed-parties-divorce-action-record-belied-husbands-contention-terms-parties-oral-settlement-agreement-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judgment, AFFIRMED, in parties' divorce action; record belied husband's contention that terms of parties' oral settlement agreement were still in dispute.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/divorce/judgment-affirmed-parties-divorce-action-record-belied-husbands-contention-terms-parties-oral-settlement-agreement-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lump Sum Alimony AFFIRMED, value of marital property exceeded that amount.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lump Sum Alimony AFFIRMED, value of marital property exceeded that amount.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/alimony/lump-sum-alimony-affirmed-marital-property-exceeded-amount/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

