<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Georgia Family Law&#187; Child Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newgafamilylaw.com/category/child-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com</link>
	<description>New Opinions, Opportunities, Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:50:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GA Lump-sum back-child support award against father VACATED, and case remanded for trial court to reconsider award in light of father&#8217;s annual income and his other child support obligations.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-lumpsum-backchild-support-award-father-vacated-case-remanded-trial-court-reconsider-award-light-fathers-annual-income-child-support-obligations/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-lumpsum-backchild-support-award-father-vacated-case-remanded-trial-court-reconsider-award-light-fathers-annual-income-child-support-obligations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA Lump-sum back-child support award against father VACATED, and case remanded for trial court to reconsider award in light of father's annual income and his other child support obligations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-lumpsum-backchild-support-award-father-vacated-case-remanded-trial-court-reconsider-award-light-fathers-annual-income-child-support-obligations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grant of father&#8217;s motion for upward modification of mother&#8217;s child support obligation, REVERSED, as evidence did not support trial court&#8217;s ruling that mother had ability or means to earn amount.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/grant-fathers-motion-upward-modification-mothers-child-support-obligation-reversed-evidence-support-trial-courts-ruling-mother-ability-means-earn-amount/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/grant-fathers-motion-upward-modification-mothers-child-support-obligation-reversed-evidence-support-trial-courts-ruling-mother-ability-means-earn-amount/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney's Fees; Expense of Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grant of father's motion for upward modification of mother's child support obligation, REVERSED, as evidence did not support trial court's ruling that mother had ability or means to earn amount.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/grant-fathers-motion-upward-modification-mothers-child-support-obligation-reversed-evidence-support-trial-courts-ruling-mother-ability-means-earn-amount/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final degree internally contradicted each party&#8217;s share of their minor child&#8217;s uninsured health case expenses.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/final-degree-internally-contradicted-partys-share-minor-childs-uninsured-health-case-expenses/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/final-degree-internally-contradicted-partys-share-minor-childs-uninsured-health-case-expenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equitable Division of Marital Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Final degree internally contradicted each party's share of their minor child's uninsured health case expenses.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/final-degree-internally-contradicted-partys-share-minor-childs-uninsured-health-case-expenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judgment increasing mother&#8217;s child support obligation, REVERSED, as trial court erred in modifying it without finding substantial change in mother&#8217;s income.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/judgment-increasing-mothers-child-support-obligation-reversed-trial-court-erred-modifying-finding-substantial-change-mothers-income/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/judgment-increasing-mothers-child-support-obligation-reversed-trial-court-erred-modifying-finding-substantial-change-mothers-income/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney's fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Custody]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judgment increasing mother's child support obligation, REVERSED, as trial court erred in modifying it without finding substantial change in mother's income.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/judgment-increasing-mothers-child-support-obligation-reversed-trial-court-erred-modifying-finding-substantial-change-mothers-income/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denial of appellant&#8217;s motion for contempt and emergency change of custody, AFFIRMED, as some evidence supported trial court&#8217;s ruling that appellee was not in contempt.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/denial-appellants-motion-contempt-emergency-change-custody-affirmed-evidence-supported-trial-courts-ruling-appellee-contempt/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/denial-appellants-motion-contempt-emergency-change-custody-affirmed-evidence-supported-trial-courts-ruling-appellee-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Contempt; Child Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denial of appellant's motion for contempt and emergency change of custody, AFFIRMED, as some evidence supported trial court's ruling that appellee was not in contempt.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/denial-appellants-motion-contempt-emergency-change-custody-affirmed-evidence-supported-trial-courts-ruling-appellee-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA trial courts are required to issue findings to explain its reasoning in reaching its decision only if trial court or jury decides to deviate from presumptive amount.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-trial-courts-required-issue-findings-explain-reasoning-reaching-decision-trial-court-jury-decides-deviate-presumptive-amount/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-trial-courts-required-issue-findings-explain-reasoning-reaching-decision-trial-court-jury-decides-deviate-presumptive-amount/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 16:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA trial courts are required to issue findings to explain its reasoning in reaching its decision only if trial court or jury decides to deviate from presumptive amount.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-trial-courts-required-issue-findings-explain-reasoning-reaching-decision-trial-court-jury-decides-deviate-presumptive-amount/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA court order transferring custody of minor child REVERSED because trial court deprived parties the opportunity to question guardian ad litem.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-court-order-transferring-custody-minor-child-reversed-trial-court-deprived-parties-opportunity-question-guardian-ad-litem/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-court-order-transferring-custody-minor-child-reversed-trial-court-deprived-parties-opportunity-question-guardian-ad-litem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Custody]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA court order transferring custody of minor child REVERSED because trial court deprived parties the opportunity to question guardian ad litem.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-court-order-transferring-custody-minor-child-reversed-trial-court-deprived-parties-opportunity-question-guardian-ad-litem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA courts must consider petitions for child support and custody, even if that child was 18 years old when it held the hearing.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-courts-petitions-child-support-custody-child-18-years-held-hearing/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-courts-petitions-child-support-custody-child-18-years-held-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Custody]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA courts must consider petitions for child support and custody, even if that child was 18 years old when it held the hearing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-courts-petitions-child-support-custody-child-18-years-held-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA father found entitled to reimbursement of more than 11.5K in overpaid child support.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-father-entitled-reimbursement-115k-overpaid-child-support/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-father-entitled-reimbursement-115k-overpaid-child-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA father found entitled to reimbursement of more than 11.5K in overpaid child support.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-father-entitled-reimbursement-115k-overpaid-child-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GA trial court erred in ruling Appellant was estopped from denying obligation to support appellee&#8217;s minor child, who was not appellant&#8217;s biological or adopted child.</title>
		<link>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-trial-court-erred-ruling-appellant-estopped-denying-obligation-support-appellees-minor-child-appellants-biological-adopted-child/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-trial-court-erred-ruling-appellant-estopped-denying-obligation-support-appellees-minor-child-appellants-biological-adopted-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia J. Remboldt, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paternity / Legitimation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promissory Estoppel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newgafamilylaw.com/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GA trial court erred in ruling Appellant was estopped from denying obligation to support appellee's minor child, who was not appellant's biological or adopted child.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newgafamilylaw.com/child-support/ga-trial-court-erred-ruling-appellant-estopped-denying-obligation-support-appellees-minor-child-appellants-biological-adopted-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
